<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2645-3460</Issn>
      <Volume>3</Volume>
      <Issue>پیاپی 3-3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2022</Year>
        <Month>06</Month>
        <Day>21</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Investigate the Mediating Role of Attitudes to Cheating in the Relationship between Social Support and Educational Justice with Cheating Behavior</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Investigate the Mediating Role of Attitudes to Cheating in the Relationship between Social Support and Educational Justice with Cheating Behavior</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>88</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>96</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <Abstract>Purpose: This research aimed to investigate the mediating role of attitudes to cheating in the relationship between social support and educational justice with cheating behavior.
Methodology: Present study was cross-sectional from type of correlation. The research population was all high school female students of Tehran city in 2018-19 academic years with number of 120000 people. The sample size was calculated according to Cochran's formula 400 people who were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling method. The research instruments were the questionnaires of attitudes to cheating (Fealy &amp; et al, 2014), social support (Zimet &amp; et al, 1988), educational justice (Golparvar, 2011) and cheating behavior (Newsted &amp; et al, 1996). Data were analyzed by structural equation modeling method with using path analysis in Amos-23 software.
Findings: The findings showed that social support and educational justice had a negative and direct effect on attitudes to cheating and cheating behavior and attitudes to cheating had a positive and direct effect on cheating behavior. Also, social support and educational justice with mediating attitudes to cheating had a negative and indirect effect on cheating behavior (P&lt;0.01). In addition, the model of mediating role of attitudes to cheating in the relationship between social support and educational justice with cheating behavior had a good fit.
Conclusion: Based on the results, to reduce cheating behavior can be developed and implemented through workshops programs to change in social support, educational justice and attitudes to cheating.</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value"></Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Attitudes to cheating</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">social support</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">educational justice</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">cheating behavior</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">students</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.qijes.com/index.php/ijes/article/download/923/923</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
